Raising Women’s Voices

The Human Right to Health

Posted in Uncategorized by raisingwomensvoices on March 27, 2009

Ipas, an international sexual health and reproducive rights organization, believes that health care advocates and reform activists can find support for their work in the principles underlying health as a human right.

Accordingly, Ipas, in collaboration with the National Economic and Social Rights Initiative, the National Health Law Program, the National Latina Institute for Reproductive Health and the National Asian Pacific American Women’s Forum, published a new fact sheet on The Human Right to Health and Women’s Reproductive Health Policy.

Health has been recognized as a human right by the UN Commission on Human Rights since 1994.  While not all of the standards outlined by the UN are legally binding in the United States, they provide a conceptual framework for advocates in the field.  The right to health requires that health services, goods, facilities and the underlying determinants of health be available, accessible, acceptable and of good quality, equally to everyone.  The factsheet applies the UN framework for the international right to health to  women’s reproductive health policy:

Reproductive health facilities, goods and services, including trained medical professionals, medicines, and underlying determinants of health, must be adequately available to all women within a country. Policies that result in fewer abortion providers, such as onerous facilities requirements, curtail the right to health for women. Also, where providers are allowed to refuse to provide contraception or abortion, effectively making these services unavailable to certain women, a woman’s right to health is violated. According to the CEDAW Committee, in such places, policies must be in place to ensure that women are referred to alternative providers willing and able to provide contraceptive and abortion services.

• The same facilities, information, goods and services must be accessible to everyone without discrimination. Accessibility must be a reality in law and in fact, particularly for the most marginalized groups. For example, comprehensive reproductive health services must be accessible to everyone, regardless of socioeconomic status, race, national origin, language ability, immigration status or sexual orientation and gender identity. Services must also be physically accessible for everyone, with a focus on vulnerable groups such as older women, women in prison or detention, women with disabilities and women who live in rural areas. Economic accessibility is an essential component of the right to health. Reproductive health services such as contraception, prenatal care and abortion must be affordable to all. Policies such as the Hyde Amendment, which bans abortion funding, disproportionately affect particular groups of people, such as poor women of color, who are unable to afford certain reproductive health services. Therefore, their right to health is violated. The government also does not fulfill the right to health in situations where poor women lack health insurance, and health care is, in effect, inaccessible. Information on reproductive health issues must also be accessible to all. Policies that restrict information on condoms for adolescents, for example, violate the right to health. 

• Reproductive health services must be acceptable to all women, particularly those who are outside the dominant culture. Policies must ensure that reproductive health services are culturally competent and acceptable according to the needs and perspectives of particular communities. To fulfill the right to health of immigrant communities in the United States, policies must ensure that the health-care workforce is culturally competent and able to work in a language that women they serve can understand. Policies must also ensure that reproductive health services are confidential.

• Health facilities, goods and services must be of good quality and based on evidence where it is available. To generate appropriate evidence to improve quality, research on health care must better include women, children and people of color. One example of poor quality is is the funding of pregnancy prevention programs that are limited to abstinence-untilmarriage messages despite evidence that such programs fail to achieve their objectives.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: